Unfortunately, adolescents,like adults, commit horrible crimes and make terrible mistakes. And, like adults, they should be held accountable — but in accordance with their age, stage of development, and greater capacity for rehabilitation.
While at one time our juvenile courts were based on a largely rehabilitative model, one designed principally to attempt to provide assistance to wayward youth, that mission has changed dramatically over the years.
Presently, juvenile offenders face significant penalties in our juvenile courts, and the focus unfortunately seems to have shifted away from rehabilitation toward a more traditional form of penal consequence, such as incarceration. For those juvenile offenders whose cases remain in the juvenile courts, certain offenders face the prospect of multiyear sentences in a juvenile correctional facility, and for sexual offenses, the prospect of having to register as a sex offender under Megan's Law.
Many people may be surprised to learn that a year-old juvenile offender who makes unwelcome sexual advances toward another year-old juvenile might face the prospect of having to register as a sex offender, but cases like this happen every day in the juvenile courts across the state.
Juveniles have no right to a trial by jury in juvenile court. There is a right to a trial, but only before the judge. One attorney, Michael Chazenrecently attempted to persuade the court that times have changed, and juveniles should be afforded the right to a jury trial.
Perhaps the time has come to rethink the issue in New Jersey.
Although permitting jury trials in every juvenile case would surely cripple the system because of the numbers involved, permitting the right to a jury trial in the following circumstances might make sense, given the magnitude of the consequences involved: Juvenile offenders facing what would be first or second degree charges if committed by an adult; Juveniles facing the prospect of having to register as a sex offender if convicted.
Limiting jury trials to these circumstances would allow juveniles facing the most serious consequences the right to have their fate decided by a jury. While adult criminal trials are decided by a jury of 12, it is conceivable that a lesser number of jurors might be appropriate in juvenile matters.
There is certainly room for honest debate about the wisdom of injecting elements of jury trials into our juvenile justice system. However, given the increasing seriousness of consequences to juveniles that have evolved in recent years, the time for a serious debate on this issue has arrived.
Although we attempt to ensure that the postings are complete, accurate, and up to date, we assume no responsibility for their completeness, accuracy, or timeliness.
The information in this blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, a lawyer-client relationship. Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel. This blog may contain links to independent third party websites and services, including social media.
We provide these links for your convenience, and you access them at your own risk. We have no control over and do not monitor the content or policies including privacy policies of these third-party websites and have no responsibility for, and no liability with respect to, their content, accuracy, or reliability.
Unless expressly stated, we do not endorse any of the linked websites or any product, service, or publication referenced herein or therein. We will remove a link to any site from this blog upon request of the linked entity.
We grant permission to readers to link to this blog so long as this blog is not misrepresented. This site is not sponsored or associated with any other site unless so identified. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you.For these reasons, American Bar Association policy states that juvenile offenders should at least have the opportunity to appear before a parole board at some point to make their case that they.
Rehabilitation should be used as punishment The definition of juvenile is a young person, mostly a child. Children learn from their surroundings — their families, peers, and other role models.
Jul 22, · Now in society people often have a set of fixed notions when it comes to current events on the issue of juvenile offenses, and whether juvenile offenders should be tried in criminal courts; although members in society think that teens should be tried as.
referred to juvenile court for their first delinquent offense before age 13 are far more likely to become chronic offenders than youth first referred to court at a later age.
Youth in Juvenile Residential Placement Facilities. While youth who are charged with the most serious and violent offenses are more likely to be tried as adults and sentenced to adult prison, juveniles with more mid-range offenses, including burglary, theft, or repeat juvenile offenders, often spend time at a traditional juvenile residential placement facility.
Rehabilitating Juvenile Violent Extremist Offenders interviews, observations, and interaction with the juvenile. • Should be reassessed periodically to mitigate effects of reasons to focus on female juvenile offenders in prison: –the role women play in VE orgs.